Looking back, we reflect on the television offerings of the past year, a handful of series stand out not for their brilliance, but for their spectacular shortcomings. Ranging from cringe-inducing sequels to bafflingly bad documentaries, here are the productions that left us utterly bewildered or simply reaching for the remote.
How to start with this divisive follow-up? Plagued with dreadful writing, painful arcs (we demand better for Miranda!), and a mere 71 seconds of fan-favourite Samantha, the series struggled to justify its existence. For a moment, as the final series started, it looked like it had finally found its groove. Then arrived an installment centered on Seemaâs natural deodorant. No wonder the creator announced this would be the last season. It ended on a bum note; the closeup of Mirandaâs loo full of poo was just way too on-the-nose. Still, viewers certainly found joy dissecting every single âwtf?â moment. And as Carrie â a single woman once more â twirled around her palatial townhouse to Barry White, who couldn't let out a little sob?
âIs Kim Kardashian an actress? The answer is a resounding no.â
But that was practically the smallest of this drama's problems. The recipient of a exceedingly uncommon no-star assessment, it was hard to know where to begin enumerating the problems. The laughably leaden writing? The tedious glorification of affluence and consumption? The seemingly wilful procession of tropes? Performances so poor they felt almost malicious? Suffice it to say âeach and every oneâ and never speak of this series again. Except, a new season has been commissioned, so weâre probably going to have to.
Given the restraining orders, abuse allegations and fatherly shortcomings, itâs reasonable to say Charlie Sheen has been a bad boy. Not that youâd truly have gleaned it from this three-part docuseries which smirked its way at Sheenâs various episodes of self-destructive excess while failing to tell us anything we didnât already know. Rather, it felt as if this volatile personality was being pandered to, so any sympathy this series might evoke should be saved for the people who have had to suffer proximity with this charismatic but dismissive narcissist.
Naturally we knew it was preposterous from the outset: a drama about a supercomputer known as Charlie Big Potatoes that could either solve global crises â or destroy all of humanity. We stuck with it out of pure love for its leads ⌠but by the end, it felt like even they had given up trying. One scarcely reacted when his character died, and the other ultimately hacking Charlie with an axe ⌠in painfully slow-motion. Talk about giving up the ghost.
Shady figures convening in empty boxing gyms? A certain band's Firestarter jackhammering away in club scenes? The late 90s called and wants its crime drama back.
Actually, that is unfair on the gangland dramas of the late 90s. Many look a little old-fashioned now, but at least they didnât endure the embarrassment of having to accommodate baffling dialects. But there were plenty of other problems. Primarily that it was just profoundly boring; a conflict over drug-selling territory between various London rogues which felt a bit basic.
Given the degree to which she provokes the ire of the nationâs performatively enraged commentators, itâs almost easy to applaud the Duchess of Sussexâs various ventures into twee lifestyle as intentional provocations. But then you view them and are compelled to admit that actually, they might have a point. Itâs like watching a lifestyle catalogue animated; a poster for evening drinks with ideas of grandeur; a procession of sleeping dogs, humming beehives, Hallmark sayings and forgettable crafting âhacksâ youâll forget instantly. All underpinned by immense, mostly undeserved wealth. Ugh.
There are obviously fascinating things to be said about both Victoria Beckham and her struggles with career, identity, self-worth. But for some reason, this three-part series chose not to say them. Rather, the viewing was like consuming a marketing catalogue. She clearly has every right to resent what she describes as her âmiserable cowâ image. But unfortunately, she didnât do herself any helps with this guarded letdown of a series.
It should have been the next cultural phenomenon â except even camper, with a famous star as a deceased benefactor and a sharp-tongued personality overseeing her estate. What more could you ask for? As players battled it out, there was plenty of betrayal and squabbling. But the rules quickly became incomprehensible: itâs even now too complicated to detail what precisely was happening. Even more disappointingly, we only saw brief appearances of the star via prerecorded videos. The series ended up smelling of a programme that was trying way too hard to emulate something far greater than it.
How do you succeed a show that captured a generation? The expectation was immense for this glitzy romcom about Jessica, a hopeful New Yorker who lands in London with a shattered romance. The lead actress seized the opportunity by the horns and was a delight to watch, reveling in Jane Austen levels of romantic notions. But it was all very slick and, paradoxically, was not enough. Plus, the sheer amount of famous cameos involved felt icky.
Not even good enough to be âpatchyâ.
Given the shrewd inclusion of gifted emerging comics, expectations were high. But sadly, most of it didnât land. A particular sketch was a one-note joke stretched to a dry pulp but repeated in every episode. One star seemed too ready to slip into a well-known ranting mode. The writing room sketches, meanwhile, simply inspired the thought that they should probably have remained in there a bit longer.
This dramatisation of the story of Amanda Knox was overseen by Amanda Knox and pretty much exclusively showcased the perspective of Amanda Knox. So, while there probably is an interesting drama to be made about the horrific 2007 murder, this isnât it. The subject matter needed to be treated sensitively. Rather, the series struggled painfully to find the right tone, lumbering from oddly breezy, slightly stylised farce to ultimately, real-life horror. Twisted? Arguably. A complete mess? Very much so.
We love the lead actor ⌠but did we believe him playing the most brilliant maths genius in history, a man so intelligent heâs on the brink of a breakthrough that could ruin society? Nope! This globe-trotting thriller about government agencies spying on â and killing off â academics honestly got more absurd by the second. Formulaic nonsense.
This uncritical portrait followed the content creator notorious for sexual exploits as she prepared for her most extreme feat yet. What on earth would possess her? What we craved was way more examination of her true psyche, plus those of the men in the line. They could at least have spoken to the now-famous mum who appeared to drag her son away from the queue. What we got was disturbing imagery and absolutely no interrogation of her infamy whatsoever. And to think, the documentary-maker has a young daughter too.
A seasoned gaming journalist with over a decade of experience covering online casinos and slot mechanics across the UK market.